|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
Kingston Black wrote:This is a regrettable affair perhaps goonswarm could get another member to represent the 10k goon votes.
May I suggest Kartoon as a replacement?
this CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Andski wrote:The only appropriate solution is to either leave Mittani on the council or start a new election. Disenfranchising a vocal group of players with 10,058 - 20% of the voting base - accounts between them is never, ever acceptable. no its only 3% of the voting base! get over your self goon... seriously! one year and then its all mittenz again... yay 
AFAIK accounts that have action against em are not allowed for CSM CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lakshata Chawla wrote:At this rate, all the goons will unsub, This is the best decision CCP has ever made.
I still wish Mittani could stay on CSM, he WAS a productive member.
By your own (very good by the way) advice... HTFU! CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Hulemand wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:CCP,
Can you confirm you were also holding everyone who just happened to be on camera at fanfest accountable to the TOS/EULA? Family members / spouses who don't play the game .. the press .. ?
I am struggling to see how you can possibly think your terms of service apply to what someone says out of game, on camera when it is YOU and your providers who choice what is broadcast and when.
There is absolutely NO legal precedent for it. What legal precedence do they need? None! Yeah, because that line works well when a lawsuit lands. Stop trying to think, you're in Raiden.
that would be the funniest lawsuit ever filled stop acting like a ....
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jim Luc wrote:If he stepped down as CHAIR only, why did this devblog state that he was stepping down from CSM6 and subsequently CSM7? Did I read the blog correctly, or am I mistaken somehow? If so then I think quite a few others are also mistaken here lol  cause ccp axed him , as they should .. 30 day ban is a minor thing
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vatek wrote:Schettino wrote:All those crying about the 10k vote loss.
The player has been banned and is out of the game -> LOSS OF REPRESENTATION.
PERIOD
Blame the player himself and NOT CCP. Sorry, no. There needs to be a system in place so that people who voted for candidates who either resign or are removed are still represented. Mittani's actions do not speak for the 10,058 people that voted for him. isuggest Remedial (sp)
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Hulemand wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:CCP,
Can you confirm you were also holding everyone who just happened to be on camera at fanfest accountable to the TOS/EULA? Family members / spouses who don't play the game .. the press .. ?
I am struggling to see how you can possibly think your terms of service apply to what someone says out of game, on camera when it is YOU and your providers who choice what is broadcast and when.
There is absolutely NO legal precedent for it. What legal precedence do they need? None! Yeah, because that line works well when a lawsuit lands. Stop trying to think, you're in Raiden. that would be the funniest lawsuit ever filled stop acting like a .... CCP have removed his ability to use the service he is paying for, without him violating the contract. That's not funny, it's the majority of civil lawsuits.
keep telling that to yourself
and imagine Alex (the RL guy ) making the judge watch the video showing the video why he was banned
Alex isnt an idiot , you on the other hand , im not sure CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
SolusLunes wrote:Andski wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:AFAIK accounts that have action against em are not allowed for CSM Krutoj made no secret about his temp ban for RMT which did _not_ lead to his removal from the CSM. QFT
as someone allready told you he was suspended, found not guilty and case closed btw RMT will get you permabanned anyway CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:28:00 -
[9] - Quote
Andski wrote:DNSBLACK discussed entering Jove space, which is considered an exploit unless moved for the Alliance Tournament. I demand that this is investigated. close your eyes and it will happen
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Li Ter wrote:Revii Lagoon wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:One person shooting at the monument in Jita.
Jeez, come on Goonies you can do better than that. Shooting the monument is for pubbies, we are going to make Jita burn. They will need to put up a monument for the massive amount of wrecks that will blot out the gates and the undock of 4-4 butthurt much? talk to the mittani about your wasted votes....he wasted them, not us, not ccp
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wasted
oh the irony CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM
CCP:-á the mittani has set an example -áto follow ? |
|

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
Quote:
You've played this game longer than I have, you were around when the CSM was actually formed and why it was formed. The CSM should be independent. They are adults and yes it is CCP's game, but interfering with a democratically elected body that in part is there to ensure that CCP is being "fair" in game is a horrible precedent.
hate to be the bringer of bad news to you but 1 , a member of the CSM has just shown that he isnt adult enough to handle alcohol and 2, CSM was never a democracy
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:00:00 -
[12] - Quote
Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Quote:
You've played this game longer than I have, you were around when the CSM was actually formed and why it was formed. The CSM should be independent. They are adults and yes it is CCP's game, but interfering with a democratically elected body that in part is there to ensure that CCP is being "fair" in game is a horrible precedent.
hate to be the bringer of bad news to you but 1 , a member of the CSM has just shown that he isnt adult enough to handle alcohol and 2, CSM was never a democracy Dude, do you know why the CSM was made? Please tell me you have more than a 2 year history. and that is exactly relevant to my post how ?
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Quote:
You've played this game longer than I have, you were around when the CSM was actually formed and why it was formed. The CSM should be independent. They are adults and yes it is CCP's game, but interfering with a democratically elected body that in part is there to ensure that CCP is being "fair" in game is a horrible precedent.
hate to be the bringer of bad news to you but 1 , a member of the CSM has just shown that he isnt adult enough to handle alcohol and 2, CSM was never a democracy Dude, do you know why the CSM was made? Please tell me you have more than a 2 year history. and that is exactly relevant to my post how ? You are saying this isn't a democracy. It is very much a democracy and you knowing or not know WHY it was made should help you to understand why it is a democracy.
in an democracy you cannot buy the right to vote with just 15 bucks a month
if you know why it was formed , you would more see it as an guide to CCP, they may follow it or not
CCP is like putin
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:09:00 -
[14] - Quote
Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:
You are saying this isn't a democracy. It is very much a democracy and you knowing or not know WHY it was made should help you to understand why it is a democracy.
in an democracy you cannot buy the right to vote with just 15 bucks a month
if you know why it was formed , you would more see it as an guide to CCP, they may follow it or not
CCP is like putin
CCP is like Putin... so I shouldn't pay any attention to you then, ok. Have a nice day. Scroll up and see Jade's response. That is a semi well thought out response.
another advice for you you will get badrepped from your buddies for praising jade ...
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:
You are saying this isn't a democracy. It is very much a democracy and you knowing or not know WHY it was made should help you to understand why it is a democracy.
in an democracy you cannot buy the right to vote with just 15 bucks a month
if you know why it was formed , you would more see it as an guide to CCP, they may follow it or not
CCP is like putin
CCP is like Putin... so I shouldn't pay any attention to you then, ok. Have a nice day. Scroll up and see Jade's response. That is a semi well thought out response. another advice for you you will get badrepped from your buddies for praising jade ... You know nothing about me. You see unlike you I try very hard to be independent and as unbiased as I possibly can. I don't give a damn if people dislike Jade, read what he actually wrote and understand you ignorant kunt. The CSM should be a democracy, it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM, but not only would it be bad PR it would just be downright bad business decision. And this is also a bad decision. The CSM either is an actual body that is independent or it is a useless rubber stamp and either next month or 6 years from now another Incarna will occur because CCP doesn't listen to advice from the one body of players elected to give them advice.
the CSM never was and never will be the final ruling power in eve thats not how you run a company or an MMO i told you allready , in an democracy you cannot buy unlimit voting slots as long as you have the bucks for it and my dear unbaised friend dont curse at me , thx CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:33:00 -
[16] - Quote
Quote:
You are ignorant, maybe not a kunt but very very ignorant. There is a difference between independence and final ruling power. The supreme court is independent, but isn't considered a ruling power. CCP interfering with the operation of the CSM when the CSM announced it would be meeting to discuss the situation interferes with it's independence. Also do you have a reading defecit?
I said
it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM
ccp is an pravate held company, not a state the CSm was fine with mittens stayin within CSM 7 , CCP was not so they overrule all as we both agree is within CCP-¦s power
also, as you may already noticed , English isnt my first language , i may have things misunderstood , for this i apology
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
Viktor Villiance wrote:Neat. So CCP caves to pressure from some people, and now The Wis will be the one who really pays the ultimate price as players in game take their rage out on him.
Congratulations, CCP, you have done more to hurt The Wis (if he was ever depressed/unstable) than a slight, snarky comment made by a pseudo-intellectual douchebag could ever.
What are you going to do now? Ban anyone who dares to kill The Wis in game? Or send him eve mails?
Anyway you slice this, you screwed him royally. I feel bad for him most of all now.
i think this guy will be the best prtected guy in eve ever at least i hope so
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:40:00 -
[18] - Quote
Andski wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Quote:
You are ignorant, maybe not a kunt but very very ignorant. There is a difference between independence and final ruling power. The supreme court is independent, but isn't considered a ruling power. CCP interfering with the operation of the CSM when the CSM announced it would be meeting to discuss the situation interferes with it's independence. Also do you have a reading defecit?
I said
it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM
ccp is an pravate held company, not a state the CSm was fine with mittens stayin within CSM 7 , CCP was not so they overrule all as we both agree is within CCP-¦s power also, as you may already noticed , English isnt my first language , i may have things misunderstood , for this i apology So CCP is reverting the CSM back to a useless PR/marketing tool rather than a player advocacy group. Cool beans.
no they just axed the one guy who broke the rule (by his own words ) and go on bussiness as usual
there was no outcry when they axed the dutch girl for ?NDA? CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Andski wrote: So CCP is reverting the CSM back to a useless PR/marketing tool rather than a player advocacy group. Cool beans.
no they just axed the one guy who broke the rule (by his own words ) and go on bussiness as usual there was no outcry when they axed the dutch girl for ?NDA? No, they let the CSM come to consensus on the issue then overruled them when they made the "wrong" decision. For the CSM to have any legitimacy other than a PR tool CCP need to either respect their decisions or make it adequately clear a decision is not theirs to make. Not this worst of both worlds crap.
it was always clear to someone with half a brain that no CEO in the whole world wil let his desicions be overuled by a bunch of internet spaceship nerds
internet spaceship may be serious business but RL business is more serious CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Raiykjab wrote:Two step wrote:I disagree with this decision, and am working hard with CCP to make sure the 10,058 voters that voted for Alex have their voice heard.
More to come, just wanted to make sure I had a spot on the first page This just show the integrity of the ppl representing us at CSM, 10058 yeah sure, we all know those guys probably voted with their 5 accounts. Bill Clinton was also elected by a majority, but kinda resigned after the sex scandal, same for DSK the boss of the FMI, this dude was favorite for the next French presidentials and now is a nobody. If you represent something and are given powers you gotta show the exemple, or you are out, that's how it works in a democracy. Seeing so many CSM members objecting about the decision is quiet disturbing, and just prove that I should get myself more accounts the next time I go vote to make it count. Honestly yours Raiykjab You can't add, can you? Even if ever single character in Goonswarm were an individual account, that is barely 7,000. And if you think every character in Goonswarm is an individual account, I've got a great bridge to sell you in Tuscon, Arizona, with a nice ocean view.
than again how many goons have multiple accounts and test and whoever kisses up to you these days
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |
|

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 02:05:00 -
[21] - Quote
Quote: words from paradigmblue
i feel bad for ccp .. all they wantet is DUST EVE interaction all over the press after FF
all they got was a drunken guy that couldnot handle himself ....
edit wrong quoting CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 02:50:00 -
[22] - Quote
Rokujochi wrote:I surely hope that CCP in its infinite wisdom has thoroughly thought out the possible repercussions of this extremely poor decision.
I sure hope that being forced to resign from CSM6, forfeit his position on CSM7 and being banned from the game for 30 days doesn't cause poor Mittani to fall into a deep depression and contemplate suicide. He LIVES for playing EvE, leading his alliance and being chair of the CSM, the loss of these combined with his clear history of alcohol abuse have me fearing for his safety.
PLEASE CCP FREE MITTANI!
http://soundcloud.com/cptunderpants/state-of-the-goonion-march
he doesnt sound ...depressed
actually he sounds like a priest trying to tame a horde of religious maniacs with promisses how bright the future will be CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 02:54:00 -
[23] - Quote
stupid monkey wrote:Minister of Death wrote:Valk Enaka wrote:Thank you CCP for throwing out my interest in the game. When you take over 10,000 of the votes for CSM and throw them out, what are you thinking? As many others said, none of this was ingame which means the EULA wouldn't apply. The Mittani publicly apologized, and in my opinion at least, went far beyond what he needed to do.
You had several thousand players interested in taking part in this process, and have told them that their opinions do not matter to you. Way to go CCP. As others have said, if you are going to ignore these votes, why even bother with the election? It is truly odd that you blame CCP for this, and not mittenz. Who did the wrong thing here? CCP or mittenz? Think about it and drop the hysterics. cept i've been told ccp provided the liquor
hahahaha
when you think youve heard it all someone tops it
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 03:00:00 -
[24] - Quote
Urziel99 wrote:Jita will surely burn.
Maybe the CFC can demonstrate to the pubbies what the 6VDT HellCamp was like for BOB?
i have the strong feeling that there is no CONCORD in fountain
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 03:08:00 -
[25] - Quote
Andski wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Urziel99 wrote:Jita will surely burn.
Maybe the CFC can demonstrate to the pubbies what the 6VDT HellCamp was like for BOB? i have the strong feeling that there is no CONCORD in fountain I have the strong feeling that CONCORD isn't going to stop tornadoes from instapopping freighters
i have the strong feeling that you have no idea how many frighters pass jita in a day
and how many tornados you will need to "burn jita down" listining to your SofG
edit clarifying CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 03:10:00 -
[26] - Quote
Urziel99 wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Urziel99 wrote:Jita will surely burn.
Maybe the CFC can demonstrate to the pubbies what the 6VDT HellCamp was like for BOB? i have the strong feeling that there is no CONCORD in fountain And when the entire coalition shows up at your doorstep you think CONCORD is going to stop them? Surely you jest.
my doorstep ?
to doe a CONCORD database failure im not allowed in highsec atm ... CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 03:13:00 -
[27] - Quote
Urziel99 wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Andski wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Urziel99 wrote:Jita will surely burn.
Maybe the CFC can demonstrate to the pubbies what the 6VDT HellCamp was like for BOB? i have the strong feeling that there is no CONCORD in fountain I have the strong feeling that CONCORD isn't going to stop tornadoes from instapopping freighters i have the strong feeling that you have no idea how many frighters pass jita in a day and how many tornados you will need to "burn jita down" listining to your SofG edit clarifying You, good sir , underestimate the industrial and financial power of the coalition. You also underestimate their desire to gank pubbies. They give no fucks, never have, never will.
it will be interresting if you can pull it off , i doubt it not gank the odd frighter , but "burn jita down" CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 03:13:00 -
[28] - Quote
Andski wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:i have the strong feeling that you have no idea how many frighters pass jita in a day
and how many tornados you will need to "burn jita down" listining to your SofG
edit clarifying 2,000 tornadoes aren't enough laff no not if you want to "burn jitta down" CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 13:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Valryon wrote:How do you ban someone for something they did outside your game? That's messed up.
NEWSFLASH
1 CCP can ban anyone if they want
2 he used INGAME material t harass an INGAME player calling for INGAME actions
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 13:19:00 -
[30] - Quote
John McCreedy wrote:From the TOS: Quote: If you are between 13 and 18 years of age, you must have the permission of your parent or guardian to before providing the personal information required to create an EVE Online game or website account.
Not to excuse what was said but how about some responsibility accepted for the debacle by CCP for allowing the presentation participants to get blind drunk before going "on air"? CCP's actions where hardly responsible when 13 year old kids (well below the legal drinking age in many countries) where able to legally access the live feed but where subjected to constant references to the glorification of irresponsible drinking, therefore CCP need to issue an apology for their part in this and review their policies towards these issues before the next Fanfest.
read the devblog they already said that FF will never be the same , sadly , because of one adult that couldnt handle alk What a lot of goon need to realise is that its not because we hate you that we do these things Its because WE LOVE YOU |
|

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 13:28:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:
as long as you use any CCP property CCP is involved and they have the right to deny you acess to their sevice at any point without refund or discussion
easy as that
get that into your head
Sure, they have a right to. The question is - should they be banning people for actions committed out of game?
in the case we are discussing now absolutely other cases may differ
What a lot of goon need to realise is that its not because we hate you that we do these things Its because WE LOVE YOU |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 14:59:00 -
[32] - Quote
former chairman What a lot of goon need to realise is that its not because we hate you that we do these things Its because WE LOVE YOU |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kosh Seere wrote:Ordais wrote:Goon tears....so many goon tears....*nomnomnom*
As for the 10.000 voters....its not CCPs fault that you candidate shot himself in the foot and can't represent you anymore. Take it up with him.
Well, i do agree with the desicion, but it will hurt the game in many ways wich makes me even MORE angry at Mittens...you just couldn't pull yourself together. All this talk about "beeing a politician" and "understanding how this works"....and then you do something STUPID like this. Well done....not. This is where your logic fails, by allowing him, after going through the slides, they are at least accessory to it, hence part guilty.
AFTER the presentation , AFTER it , no slides involved
get that into your skull
all his fault ...
What a lot of goon need to realise is that its not because we hate you that we do these things Its because WE LOVE YOU |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 22:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Emiko P'eng wrote:As a first time attendee at FanFest the Alliance Panel just reinforced my views of Goonswarm and their leader in particular
The Q&A section basically shows what binge drinking can do to your life. RUIN IT!!!
The apology & CCP's actions I feel are enough
The fact that fans and CCP can go drinking together and have a party at the end. Has no bearing on this as they are both 'unofficial' when it comes to what is said or done. Unless they burn down a bar or kill someone
The Alliance Panel though, being an officially sanctioned by CCP and 'monitored' as in CCP vet the presentations. Is covered by the EULA. So when someone does break the EULA by their own stupidity CCP needs to act.
Unfortunately the real damage done here to CCP is due to the whole thing being broadcast
The fact that this panel was transmitted live to anyone on the planet. In HD for CCP subscribers who paid and normal for anyone else, CCP subscriber or 'NOT' highlights CCP's naivety about live broadcasts. Live broadcasts should always be run with a time delay to allow for offending or illegal actions to be removed or 'bleeped'
Even the BBC uses it on the satirical political panel show 'Have I got News for You'
As for CSM I feel a re-run of the election is required and if 'Goonswarm' wishes to put forward a new candidate they should be allowed too. As stupidity the of one should never get in the way of representation of the many!
remember nipplegate a few years ago ? even high profile TV station made the same mistake ...
so its hard to blame a game company running for 10k visitors What a lot of goon need to realise is that its not because we hate you that we do these things Its because WE LOVE YOU |
|
|
|